zreferences#

Score breakdown#

Category	Score	One-line note
Writing	10/10	no mechanical violations detected.
Math	N/A	no mathematical content.
Code	N/A	no executable code cells.
JAX	out of scope	JAX rules target `lecture-jax`.
Figures	N/A	no figures or plotting code.
References	N/A	no citations in this lecture.
Links	10/10	no mechanical violations detected.
Admonitions	N/A	no admonitions, exercises or solutions.

None found.

None found.

None found.

None found.

This page is not reviewable for the judgment rules and should not be scored as if it were. It is five lines of content: a (references)= anchor (12), an H1 (13), and a {bibliography} directive (15-16). There is no prose, no mathematics, no code and no figures, so all eight judgment rules - qe-writing-002, 003, 005, 007, qe-math-009, 014, 015 and qe-code-001 - have nothing to apply to. The entire rendered page is generated by sphinxcontrib-bibtex from the .bib file, so any style question about its content belongs to the bibliography entries, which live outside this repository’s corpus.
The whole page is one {bibliography} directive against _static/quant-econ.bib (15-16), so the reference list cannot drift out of step with the {cite} roles that populate it - there is no hand-maintained list to fall behind.
The (references)= anchor sits directly above the H1 (12-13), so cross-series links target the page rather than a heading inside it, and the H1 is a bare # References with no decoration.
The filename is zreferences.md so that an alphabetical TOC places it last, while the anchor and the visible heading are both references - the sort key is kept out of what the reader sees.

Consider dropping the jupytext and kernelspec front matter (1-10): the page has no code cells, so the declared Python 3 kernel is never used, and the file is still converted to an executable notebook at build time.
Nothing else to remediate. The drafted report’s 10.0 / 10 and NONE priority are correct but slightly misleading in kind: they record the absence of anything to measure rather than a clean bill of style.
If the aggregate pages treat per-lecture scores as comparable, consider excluding this file (and the equivalent zreferences.md in the other four series) from series averages, since a five-line generated page scoring 10 pulls a series mean upwards for no editorial reason.
One thing worth checking outside this file: the bibliography path at 15 is written relative (_static/quant-econ.bib) rather than root-relative (/_static/quant-econ.bib); confirm that matches the convention used by the other four series before changing anything.