zreferences#

Score breakdown#

Category	Score	One-line note
Writing	10/10	no mechanical violations detected.
Math	N/A	no mathematical content.
Code	N/A	no executable code cells.
JAX	out of scope	JAX rules target `lecture-jax`.
Figures	N/A	no figures or plotting code.
References	N/A	no citations in this lecture.
Links	10/10	no mechanical violations detected.
Admonitions	N/A	no admonitions, exercises or solutions.

None found.

None found.

None found.

None found.

Not reviewable against the eight judgment rules, and the empty judgment list above is that finding, not an omission. zreferences.md is 17 lines, of which 10 are jupytext front matter: the whole page is an anchor, an H1 and a single {bibliography} directive pointing at _static/quant-econ.bib (12-16). It contains no prose sentence, no code cell, no mathematics, no figure and no emphasis of any kind, so there is literally nothing for qe-writing-002, qe-writing-003, qe-writing-005, qe-writing-007, qe-math-009, qe-code-001, qe-math-014 (proposed) or qe-math-015 (proposed) to read - the rendered reference list is generated from the {cite} roles in the other 130 lectures. The drafted score of 10.0 is therefore correct but vacuous: it records that nothing violated a rule because nothing was there to violate one. The single action below is the only thing worth changing on the page.
The entire page is one {bibliography} directive against _static/quant-econ.bib (15-16), so the reference list cannot drift out of step with the {cite} roles that populate it - there is no hand-maintained list to fall behind.
The (references)= anchor sits directly above the H1 (12-13), so cross-series links target the page rather than a heading inside it.

Consider dropping the jupytext and kernelspec front matter (1-10): the page has no code cells, so the declared Python 3 kernel is never used and the file is still converted to an executable notebook at build time.