numpy_vs_numba_vs_jax#
Series: lecture-python-programming
File:
lectures/numpy_vs_numba_vs_jax.mdAudit date: 2026-05-28
Categories audited: writing, math, code, figures, references, links, admonitions (JAX out of scope)
Overall score: 8.3 / 10
Priority: LOW
Score breakdown#
Category |
Score |
One-line note |
|---|---|---|
Writing |
7/10 |
Mixed heading conventions; ~10 Title Case stragglers. |
Math |
8/10 |
Clean math; trivial usage. |
Code |
9/10 |
|
JAX |
out of scope |
(JAX comparison lecture.) |
Figures |
7/10 |
One |
References |
N/A |
No citations. |
Links |
10/10 |
Uses |
Admonitions |
9/10 |
|
Issues#
Critical#
None found.
High severity#
None found.
Medium severity#
[qe-writing-006] — Several headings still use Title Case. Examples: line 77
### Problem Statement, line 180### Memory Issues, line 201### A Comparison with Numba, line 243### Parallelized Numba, line 290### Vectorized code with JAX, line 337### JAX plus vmap, line 395### Summary, line 424### Numba Version, line 459### JAX Version, line 559### Summary. Count: ~10 occurrences.
Low severity#
[qe-fig-001] — One
figsize=(10, 8)at line 101 for the 3D surface plot — arguably justified for 3D rendering, but not annotated as such.[qe-fig-005] — Code-generated 3D plot at line 101 lacks
name:for cross-referencing.
Strengths#
Lecture title “NumPy vs Numba vs JAX” follows qe-writing-006.
H2 headings (“Vectorized operations”, “Sequential operations”, “Overall recommendations”) correctly use sentence case.
Math conventions clean (no
^T, no bold vectors, no*).One-sentence paragraphs throughout.
Exemplary use of
qe.Timer()for 17+ benchmark blocks per qe-code-004.Greek unicode (μ, ν, ρ, β, σ, ξ, η) used pervasively per qe-code-002.
Recommended actions#
Convert Title Case H3 headings to sentence case (“Problem statement”, “Memory issues”, “A comparison with Numba”, “Parallelized Numba”, “Vectorized code with JAX”, “JAX plus vmap”, “Summary”, “Numba version”, “JAX version”).
Optional: remove
figsize=(10, 8)on line 101 or document the 3D-plot rationale.